Deathryte
11-20-2016, 12:59 AM
Didn't know where to put this so figured here will do.
I know a lot of people are excited about pvp/arena but I personally am hesitant after watching other games (not going to name as to prevent non relevant arguments) screw it up in one form or another, I prefer pvp elements to gaming. My concern is over division that could be caused by forced pvp participation and pvp only rewards. So I just thought I'd add a couple of ideas with hope of others following suit.
1. As stated optional pvp meaning that if someone doesn't setup a team or compete in a league their not going to be victimised for it.
2. Pvp runs off a currency like trooper points which has similar things available for purchase.
3. Limit the impact of pvp only rewards after all if a talisman set is only pvp but gives huge bonus it'll be no different to people making use of bugs before the October update.
I know a lot of people are excited about pvp/arena but I personally am hesitant after watching other games (not going to name as to prevent non relevant arguments) screw it up in one form or another, I prefer pvp elements to gaming. My concern is over division that could be caused by forced pvp participation and pvp only rewards. So I just thought I'd add a couple of ideas with hope of others following suit.
1. As stated optional pvp meaning that if someone doesn't setup a team or compete in a league their not going to be victimised for it.
2. Pvp runs off a currency like trooper points which has similar things available for purchase.
3. Limit the impact of pvp only rewards after all if a talisman set is only pvp but gives huge bonus it'll be no different to people making use of bugs before the October update.