After 7 months, the BoS finally gave me a Sentinel Eddie other than Mummy . . . FotD.
I'm currently using my maxed Regular Eddie (skills and talismans) on my PvP defense team. I'm not planning to focus on PvP, but I'd like to be decently respectable.
During the beta, I saw a lot of chatter about Mummy being pretty good. Is that still the case?
How do Mummy and FotD compare on defense? Are either worth taking to max skills? Thanks!
druid138-6195
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: Mummy or FotD for PvP Defense
-
02-16-2017, 05:33 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2016
- Location
- Pacific Northwest
- OS
- Android
- Posts
- 1,328
Mummy or FotD for PvP Defense
-
02-16-2017, 09:02 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2016
- Location
- Canyptian-2758
- OS
- iOS
- Posts
- 278
My personal experience had been that I've used FOTD sparingly on offense only, but the AI for mummy is superb for defense.
My 2 cents.
-
02-21-2017, 10:10 AM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- Sofia
- OS
- Android
- Posts
- 102
Mummy's your guy, 100% AoE perfect hits, taunt, cleanse and titan shield!
If you want CC, he's your guy.Schadenfreud-0217
Maxed Champions:
Speed of Light Eddie (Magus)
Grim Reaper Eddie (Magus)
Soldier Eddie (Gunner)
The Nomad (Warrior)
Angel of Fear (Warrior)
Child of the Damned (Gunner)
Child of the Damned (Assassin)
Allied Soldier (Magus)
Soulless Demon (Sentinel)
Using CotD as leader, if you want me to switch to any of the others, or just have questions towards me in general, feel free to P.M. me.
-
02-22-2017, 04:36 AM #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- West Allis WI, USA
- OS
- iOS
- Posts
- 164
Lots of people use mummy Eddie and he's tough! I haven't fought many FotD Eddies though, I would like to think he's better but I have no proof. So for now it seams like mummy wins .
Reply With Quote
